Menu
Menu
Menu
By Melanie M. Ghaw, Esq. and Rachel H. Khedouri, Esq. On July 25, 2023, the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) published a final rule authorizing
By Shirley Castillo, Legal Intern In its recent decision, Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co., 600 U.S. (2023), the United States Supreme Court held
By Moira Phan, Legal Intern and Rachel H. Khedouri, Esq. New Jersey’s Unemployment Compensation Law (“NJ UCL”) has long required employers to inform newly
By Melanie M. Ghaw, Esq. and Rachel H. Khedouri, Esq. Effective June 21, 2023, the New York State Department of Labor (“NYSDOL”) amended its
By Melanie M. Ghaw, Esq. A recent decision by the United States Supreme Court resolved a long-standing circuit split on the issue of whether
By Erica M. Clifford, Esq. The recently established Third Circuit precedent barring out-of-state plaintiffs from joining a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards
By Catherine Williams, Esq. On March 22, 2023, the General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued a guidance memorandum clarifying the
By Catherine Williams, Esq. New York employers should be aware that Governor Hochul has recently signed an amendment clarifying New York State’s new pay
By Catherine Williams, Esq. In February 2023, the federal Department of Labor (DOL) issued a new Field Assistance Bulletin providing guidance as to how
Catherine Williams, Esq. On February 21, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued a decision, McLaren Macomb, 372 NLRB No. 58, making it more
By Stacy L. Fode, Esq., Nana J. Yee, Esq. and Catherine Williams, Esq. Finally some good news for California employers, but the fight is
By Rachel H. Khedouri, Esq. *UPDATE: – In connection with the new requirement for temporary help service firms to provide certain information to temporary
NJ Appellate Division Issues Latest Pro-Arbitration Ruling Requiring Former Re/Max Agent to Arbitrate Sexual Harassment Claims Brought under LAD By Lindsey Andreozzi, Esq., February
New Union, New Agreement: The Third Circuit holds original CBAs with prior labor union invalid in Utility Workers United Association, Local 537 v. Pennsylvania
COVID-19 Employment Lawsuits Climbing the Courts: Second Circuit to Hear Previously Dismissed Public Nuisance and Workplace Safety Claims Against Amazon. By Jesse Grasty, Esq.,
Third Circuit Holds That Good Faith Bargaining Requires Production of Presumptively Relevant Information, Not A Concession To Overbroad Requests By Kristine V. Ryan,
NJ Supreme Court Slims Down the Requirements for Enforceable Arbitration Agreements By Nivritha Ketty, Esq., September 15, 2020 In a unanimous ruling last week,
YOU’VE GOT MAIL! NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT ISSUES KEY RULING UPHOLDING THE USE OF ELECTRONIC ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS IN THE EMPLOYMENT CONTEXT By Iman Wells,
SIGN UP NOW to receive time sensitive employment law alerts and invitations to complimentary informational webinars and seminars.
"*" indicates required fields
By clicking this button and submitting information to us, you will be submitting certain personally identifiable information, or information which used together with other information, can be used to identify you and/or identify information about you, to Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, PC (“NFC”). Such information may be used by NFC to contact or identify you. Personally identifiable information may include, but is not limited to, your [name, phone number, address and/or] email address. We collect this information for the purpose of providing services, identifying and communicating with you, responding to your requests/inquiries, and improving our services. We may use your personally identifiable Information to contact you with time sensitive employment law e-alerts, marketing or promotional offers, invitations to complimentary and informational webinars and seminars, and other information that may be of interest to you. However, by providing any of the foregoing information to you, we are not creating an attorney-client relationship between you and NFC: nor are we providing legal advice to you. You may opt out of receiving any, or all, of these communications from us by following the unsubscribe link in any email we send. However, this will not unsubscribe you from receiving future communications from us which are based upon an independent request, relationship or act by you.