While states have been busy passing their own independent contractor misclassification laws, on January 7, 2021, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) published its final rule adopting a streamlined “economic reality” test to determine a worker’s status as an employee or an independent contractor for purposes of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The new rule does not become effective until March 8, 2021, leaving open an opportunity for withdrawal by the Biden Administration.
Until now, the DOL and courts have been using various multifactor balancing tests to make the determination of whether a worker is an employee or independent contractor under the FLSA. The new regulations retain the aspect of a multifactor test but put the majority of the weight on two “core factors”:
The new test puts the emphasis on the worker, rather than the employer’s work structure. Thus, the core factors look to whether the worker has freedom to determine when to work, on what projects and for whom and to the impact of the worker’s own actions on his or her earnings. If both core factors suggest the worker is an employee, this is unlikely to be outweighed by any other factors in favor of independent contractor classification. However, three additional factors may serve as “guideposts,” particularly where the core factors are inconclusive:
Other factors also may be considered to the extent they inform the ultimate question of whether the individual is, as a matter of economic reality, dependent on the employer or in business for him- or herself. Significantly, the DOL made clear in its commentary that simply offering health, retirement or other benefits to a worker does not necessarily indicate employment status, provided that the benefits are not the same as those offered to employees and the other factors continue to support the conclusion that the worker is an independent contractor.
The new regulations explain that, in determining whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor, actual practice is more relevant than what may be contractually or theoretically possible. The regulations provide six examples (CLICK HERE TO VIEW) demonstrating how the new test may be applied under various factual situations.
While NFC has been recommending that employers revisit their independent contractor classifications due to changing state laws, this final DOL rule underscores the necessity of that task.
Please e-mail the NFC attorney you work with or call us directly for assistance reviewing your employee classifications in light of this new rule or any other employment law needs you may have.
By clicking this button and submitting information to us, you will be submitting certain personally identifiable information, or information which used together with other information, can be used to identify you and/or identify information about you, to Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, PC (“NFC”). Such information may be used by NFC to contact or identify you. Personally identifiable information may include, but is not limited to, your [name, phone number, address and/or] email address. We collect this information for the purpose of providing services, identifying and communicating with you, responding to your requests/inquiries, and improving our services. We may use your personally identifiable Information to contact you with time sensitive employment law e-alerts, marketing or promotional offers, invitations to complimentary and informational webinars and seminars, and other information that may be of interest to you. However, by providing any of the foregoing information to you, we are not creating an attorney-client relationship between you and NFC: nor are we providing legal advice to you. You may opt out of receiving any, or all, of these communications from us by following the unsubscribe link in any email we send. However, this will not unsubscribe you from receiving future communications from us which are based upon an independent request, relationship or act by you.